What you get
A claim-by-claim substantiation file: the peer-reviewed evidence supporting each claim, the evidence against it, a defensibility grade, and suggested wording the evidence actually supports.Who it’s for
Product, brand, regulatory, and R&D teams in consumer goods, sports and performance products, supplements, and devices — plus the consultancies who advise them.The prompt
The API call
Demand controlled human evidence at a realistic size:What to check before you trust it
- Check the population column on every row. The most common substantiation failure is real evidence from a population that is not your customer.
- Direct versus surrogate outcome is load-bearing. A biomechanical proxy does not substantiate an injury-reduction claim, however strong the correlation.
- Confirm the negative pass actually ran. If there are no contradicting citations anywhere in the file, it was skipped — null findings exist in almost every applied field.
- Take the suggested wording seriously. The narrower claim is usually still a good claim, and it is the one you can defend.
Related
Extract numbers and formulas from full-text papers
Pull the effect sizes behind the claim into a comparable table.
Find human-factors evidence for a design decision
The human-subjects evidence behind a product decision.
Best practices
The filter ladder and the rest of the primitives.
All use cases
Browse the gallery by persona.