Finding papers
| Term | What it means |
|---|---|
| Corpus | The set of papers being searched. In Consensus: All, Medical, or My Library, chosen under + › Search corpus. |
| Peer review | Other experts checked the paper before the journal published it. |
| Preprint | A paper shared publicly before peer review. Useful for new results, but not yet checked. |
| Abstract | The short summary at the top of a paper. |
| Full text | The whole paper: introduction, methods, results, and discussion. |
| DOI | A permanent ID for a paper, like 10.1000/182. Paste it into Consensus to find that exact paper. |
| Citation count | How many other papers cite this one. A rough sign of influence, not of quality. |
| Seminal paper | A foundational paper that much of a field builds on. |
| Journal quartile (Q1–Q4) | A journal’s rank within its field. Q1 means the top 25%. |
| Retracted | Withdrawn after publication, usually because of errors or misconduct. Don’t cite it. |
Study types
| Term | What it means |
|---|---|
| RCT (randomized controlled trial) | People are randomly put into a treatment group or a comparison group. The strongest single study for cause and effect. |
| Cohort study | Follows a group over time to see who develops an outcome. |
| Case-control study | Compares people who have an outcome with people who don’t, looking back for causes. |
| Cross-sectional study | A snapshot of a group at one point in time. |
| Case study / case report | A detailed look at one person, group, or event. |
| Literature review | A summary of research on a topic, written by an expert. |
| Systematic review | A review that follows a strict, repeatable method to find and judge every relevant study. |
| Meta-analysis | Combines the numbers from many studies into one overall result. |
Reading results
| Term | What it means |
|---|---|
| Population | Who was studied, such as adults with type 2 diabetes. |
| Intervention | The treatment or exposure being tested. |
| Outcome | What was measured to judge the result. |
| Sample size (n) | How many people or things were studied. Bigger is usually more reliable. |
| Effect size | How big the difference or relationship is, not just whether one exists. |
| Statistically significant | Unlikely to be due to chance alone. It doesn’t mean the effect is large or important. |
| Correlation vs causation | Two things happening together (correlation) doesn’t prove one causes the other (causation). |
| Confounder | A third factor that could explain a result, such as age or income. |
| Limitation | A weakness the authors admit, usually near the end of the discussion. |
Doing research
| Term | What it means |
|---|---|
| Literature review (the task) | Reading and summarizing what’s known about your topic, usually the first step of a project. |
| Research gap | A question the research hasn’t answered yet. |
| Backward citation tracing | Reading the papers a paper cites, to see what it built on. |
| Forward citation tracing | Reading the papers that cite a paper, to see what came after. |
| Snowballing | Repeating citation tracing from paper to paper to build a reading list. |
| PICO | A way to frame a question: Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome. |